Comparative Study
Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Racial differences in oral glucose screening test results: establishing race-specific criteria for abnormality in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the 1-hour glucose screening test threshold of 140 mg/dL yields similar results in identifying gravidas with gestational diabetes mellitus in different races and, if not, to establish consistent race-specific thresholds.

METHODS: Nine hundred twenty-one gravidas undergoing routine third-trimester glucose screening were categorized as white, black, Asian, or Filipino. Mean (+/- standard deviation) glucose screening test values, the proportions with results exceeding 140 mg/dL, and the positive predictive values for gestational diabetes mellitus were calculated by race. Race-specific thresholds were calculated by standardizing the percentile rank cutoff for test results in each group.

RESULTS: Mean glucose screening test results differed significantly by race: blacks 116.4 +/- 31.6 mg/dL, whites 123.2 +/- 28.4 mg/dL, Filipinos 127.6 +/- 26.3 mg/dL, and Asians 134.7 +/- 25.0 mg/dL (P < .001). No significant difference was found between Hispanic and non-Hispanic whites (123.2 +/- 28.3 versus 123.5 +/- 28.5 mg/dL). Significant different proportions of gravidas exceeded the 140-mg/dL threshold by race: blacks 17.5%, whites 27.4%, Filipinos 31.3%, and Asians 40.6%. The proportions with results above 140 mg/dL who had abnormal 3-hour glucose tolerance tests also varied markedly by race: blacks 42.9%, whites 17.3%, Filipinos 11.5%, and Asians 11.5%. Adjusted screening test thresholds, calculated for each race to establish consistency of the screening test, were 130 mg/dL for blacks, 140 mg/dL for whites, 145 mg/dL for Filipinos, and 150 mg/dL for Asians.

CONCLUSION: Race-specific glucose screening test thresholds should be used to ensure consistency in properly identifying gravidas at risk for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app