Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Detection of malignancies with SPECT versus PET, with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Radiology 1996 January
PURPOSE: To compare single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG to evaluate malignancies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: PET and SPECT, with fluorine-18 sodium fluoride, were performed sequentially in a cylindric phantom that contained different size spheres with activity ratios of 5:1, 10:1, and 15:1. PET and SPECT were also performed in 24 patients with known or suspected malignancies.

RESULTS: Sensitivities of PET and SPECT were 2,238 cpm/microCi (82.8 cpm/MBq) and 129 cpm/microCi (4.8 cpm/MBq), respectively (reconstructed spatial resolution, 7 and 17 mm, respectively [13-cm radius of rotation]). In the phantom studies, lesions of 1.5 and 1.3 cm or more in diameter were detected with a ratio of 5:1 and 10:1, respectively, and an information density of 150 counts per square centimeter. At FDG PET, 46 hypermetabolic lesions consistent with tumor were depicted in patients; at FDG SPECT, 36 (78%) were depicted. Sensitivity of FDG SPECT was 92% for detection of malignancies 1.8 cm or more in diameter seen at FDG PET.

CONCLUSION: Findings at FDG SPECT can help differentiate benign from malignant lesions.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app