We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Correlation of lower esophageal mucosal ring and 24-h pH monitoring of the esophagus.
American Journal of Gastroenterology 1996 January
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship of LEMR and gastroesophageal reflux. The pathogenesis of the lower esophageal mucosal ring (LEMR) is not known. The most likely theory is that the ring results from reflux esophagitis as part of the morphological spectrum of peptic stricture.
METHODS: We correlated barium esophagrams and 24-h pH monitoring (pHM) in 343 patients (173 women, 170 men; mean age 52 yr). Patients were categorized into three groups by radiographic findings: 1) normal esophagus (n = 121), 2) hiatal hernia (HH) only (n = 174), and 3) LEMR (n =48). Abnormal pHM was defined as a total percentage of the esophageal acid exposure time of 6% or more; abnormal pHM was also analyzed relative to patient position (supine vs. upright).
RESULTS: Findings showed that 21 (17%) of 121 normal patients had abnormal pHM compared with 58 (33%) of 174 patients with HH and 15 (31%) of 48 patients with LEMR. Normal patients had a significantly lower frequency of abnormal pHM (p < 0.01) vs. the other two groups; however, no significant difference in results of pHM was found in the groups with HH and LEMR. No significant relationships of abnormal supine versus upright pHM was observed comparing the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) Most patients in this study had normal pHM, regardless of the anatomic status of the esophagogastric region; 2) patients with HH and LEMR had a higher frequency of abnormal pHM, although the two groups were not significantly different; and 3) an etiological relationship of LEMR and gastroesophageal reflux was not supported, other than its association with HH.
METHODS: We correlated barium esophagrams and 24-h pH monitoring (pHM) in 343 patients (173 women, 170 men; mean age 52 yr). Patients were categorized into three groups by radiographic findings: 1) normal esophagus (n = 121), 2) hiatal hernia (HH) only (n = 174), and 3) LEMR (n =48). Abnormal pHM was defined as a total percentage of the esophageal acid exposure time of 6% or more; abnormal pHM was also analyzed relative to patient position (supine vs. upright).
RESULTS: Findings showed that 21 (17%) of 121 normal patients had abnormal pHM compared with 58 (33%) of 174 patients with HH and 15 (31%) of 48 patients with LEMR. Normal patients had a significantly lower frequency of abnormal pHM (p < 0.01) vs. the other two groups; however, no significant difference in results of pHM was found in the groups with HH and LEMR. No significant relationships of abnormal supine versus upright pHM was observed comparing the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) Most patients in this study had normal pHM, regardless of the anatomic status of the esophagogastric region; 2) patients with HH and LEMR had a higher frequency of abnormal pHM, although the two groups were not significantly different; and 3) an etiological relationship of LEMR and gastroesophageal reflux was not supported, other than its association with HH.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app