We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: diagnostic performance studies.
Clinical Radiology 1996 April
OBJECTIVES: To review and reassess the published diagnostic performance statistics for MRI of the menisci and cruciate ligaments. To illustrate the potential sources and effects of bias in the evaluation of this widely accepted diagnostic technique.
METHODS: Published evaluations of knee MRI were identified from the literature. Criteria for inclusion in the review were a total sample size > or = 35, arthroscopic correlation of MRI findings and presentation of complete results. Diagnostic performance statistics were then recalculated for each published study.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified with sample sizes between 35 and 1014. The overall sensitivity for MRI of the menisci and cruciates was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.86-0.90). The overall specificity was 0.94 (0.93-0.94). Sampling error varied widely amongst studies and was rarely quantified.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance statistics are widely used. It is still not well appreciated that these are subject to sampling error. Such errors make meaningful comparisons between published studies more difficult. Nevertheless, the results for meniscal and cruciate lesions are consistently high and support the use of MRI for these common problems. The diagnostic performance of other applications of MRI should be subjected to similar critical review.
METHODS: Published evaluations of knee MRI were identified from the literature. Criteria for inclusion in the review were a total sample size > or = 35, arthroscopic correlation of MRI findings and presentation of complete results. Diagnostic performance statistics were then recalculated for each published study.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified with sample sizes between 35 and 1014. The overall sensitivity for MRI of the menisci and cruciates was 0.88 (95% confidence interval 0.86-0.90). The overall specificity was 0.94 (0.93-0.94). Sampling error varied widely amongst studies and was rarely quantified.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic performance statistics are widely used. It is still not well appreciated that these are subject to sampling error. Such errors make meaningful comparisons between published studies more difficult. Nevertheless, the results for meniscal and cruciate lesions are consistently high and support the use of MRI for these common problems. The diagnostic performance of other applications of MRI should be subjected to similar critical review.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app