We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Cardiorespiratory function before and after corrective surgery in pectus excavatum.
Journal of Pediatrics 1996 May
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether pectus excavatum (PE) results in cardiopulmonary abnormalities, and whether surgical repair results in improvement.
METHODS: We performed pulmonary function testing and incremental exercise testing in 36 adolescents with PE (aged 16 +/- 3 (SD) years) and 10 age-matched, healthy control subjects. Fifteen PE subjects were reexamined postoperatively, as were six control subjects.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, PE subjects had a significantly lower forced vital capacity than control subjects had (81% +/- 14% vs 98% +/- 9% of the predicted value; p < 0.001). Chest computed tomography ratios of internal transverse to antero-posterior diameters correlated inversely with total lung capacity (r = 0.56; p < 0.01). Fifty-eight percent of PE subjects had subjective complaints of exercise limitation. PE subjects exercised at a workload similar to that of control subjects. Maximal heart rate and O2 pulse did not differ between the two groups. Respiratory measurements during exercise were similar between the two groups. Respiratory measurements during exercise were similar between the two groups. Postoperatively there was no change in forced vital capacity (as a percentage of the predicted value). The PE subjects exercised for a slightly longer period and had a slightly higher O2 pulse, whereas control subjects showed no change.
CONCLUSION: Some subjects with PE have mild restrictive lung disease, which is not affected by surgical repair. Postoperatively they have a slight increase in exercise tolerance and O2 pulse, which suggests improved cardiac function during exercise. However, the clinical implications of this modest improvement are unclear.
METHODS: We performed pulmonary function testing and incremental exercise testing in 36 adolescents with PE (aged 16 +/- 3 (SD) years) and 10 age-matched, healthy control subjects. Fifteen PE subjects were reexamined postoperatively, as were six control subjects.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, PE subjects had a significantly lower forced vital capacity than control subjects had (81% +/- 14% vs 98% +/- 9% of the predicted value; p < 0.001). Chest computed tomography ratios of internal transverse to antero-posterior diameters correlated inversely with total lung capacity (r = 0.56; p < 0.01). Fifty-eight percent of PE subjects had subjective complaints of exercise limitation. PE subjects exercised at a workload similar to that of control subjects. Maximal heart rate and O2 pulse did not differ between the two groups. Respiratory measurements during exercise were similar between the two groups. Respiratory measurements during exercise were similar between the two groups. Postoperatively there was no change in forced vital capacity (as a percentage of the predicted value). The PE subjects exercised for a slightly longer period and had a slightly higher O2 pulse, whereas control subjects showed no change.
CONCLUSION: Some subjects with PE have mild restrictive lung disease, which is not affected by surgical repair. Postoperatively they have a slight increase in exercise tolerance and O2 pulse, which suggests improved cardiac function during exercise. However, the clinical implications of this modest improvement are unclear.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app