Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prevention of bone loss in cardiac transplant recipients. A comparison of biphosphonates and vitamin D.

Transplantation 1996 May 28
Bone mineral density is already abnormally reduced at the moment of cardiac transplantation and bone loss occurs at an impressive rate in the first postoperative year. The aim of the study was to compare two prophylactic medical regimens as to their efficacy in mitigating bone loss after transplantation. Forty-eight consecutive recipients were randomized to receive either alternating calcium carbonate and disodium etidronate (group A) or a daily supplement of calcium carbonate and alphacalcidol (group B). Bone mineral density measurements were performed immediately before hospital discharge and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Clinical events were recorded and roentgenograms of the spine were performed postoperatively and 1 and 2 years later. In both treatment groups bone loss remained significant at the level of the lumbar spine in the first postoperative year (P<0.005) and at the level of the femoral neck in the first (P<0.005) and the second (P<0.06) year after transplantation. Six months after transplantation, however, patients receiving alphacalcidol had a significant reduction in bone loss at the level of the lumbar spine (P=0.047) and at the level of the femoral neck (P=0.043). At the level of the femoral neck this decrease in bone loss was even more pronounced in the second postoperative year (P<0.001). In the group of patients treated with disodium etidronate, 4 recipients needed additional hospitalizations for treatment of symptomatic fractures at the level of the lumbar spine or the femoral neck. No such events happened in recipients receiving vitamin D supplements. Prophylactic administration of calcium carbonate and alphacalcidol after cardiac transplantation reduces bone loss and seems to decrease osteoporotic complications.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app