We have located links that may give you full text access.
Radiation alone for carcinoma of the vagina: variation in response related to the location of the primary tumor.
Cancer 1996 May 2
BACKGROUND: A retrospective study of 40 patients with histologically confirmed carcinoma of the vagina is reported. The patients were treated by radiation alone (a combination of external beam therapy and implants) between October 1969 and September 1991 at the Medical College of Virginia Hospital in Richmond.
METHODS: Thirty-three patients (82%) had squamous cell carcinoma, 2 patients (7%) had adenocarcinoma, and 2 patients (5%) had poorly differentiated cancers (1 melanoma and 1 leiomyosarcoma). The patients were staged according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system; there were 13 patients (33%) in Stage 1, 21 (52%) in Stage II, 4 (10%) in Stage III, and 2 (5%) in Stage IV. Thirty-six patients (90%) were treated with external beam therapy and some combination of implant: cylinder, ovoid, or interstitial implants with iodine-125 or iridium-192 (afterloading). Only 4 patients (10%) received treatment by implant only.
RESULTS: Based on their response, two groups of patients were identified. Group I had 23 patients with tumors predominantly located in the proximal half of the vagina; there were 8 patients in Stage I, 11 in Stage II, 3 in Stage III, and 1 in Stage IV. Of these, three patients failed: one each in Stages III and IV and one Stage II patient was salvaged by surgery. Three patients died due to unrelated causes but with local control. The 5-year actuarial survival in this group was 81%. Group II had 17 patients with tumors located in the mid to distal half of the vagina; there were 5 patients in Stage I, 10 in Stage II, and 2 in Stage IV. Ten patients failed. Eight patients in Stage II had persistent disease, were lost to follow-up, and are presumed dead. Two patients with Stage IV disease also had inadequate local control. The overall actuarial survival in the distal group was 41%, which was significantly worse than the proximal group (81%), at a P value of 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: This study discusses the curability of carcinoma of the vagina based on its anatomic location when predominantly similar treatment techniques and radiation doses were applied to either the proximal or the distal part of the vagina, those with cancer in the proximal half had better survival (81%) than those whose cancer was in the distal half (41%).
METHODS: Thirty-three patients (82%) had squamous cell carcinoma, 2 patients (7%) had adenocarcinoma, and 2 patients (5%) had poorly differentiated cancers (1 melanoma and 1 leiomyosarcoma). The patients were staged according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system; there were 13 patients (33%) in Stage 1, 21 (52%) in Stage II, 4 (10%) in Stage III, and 2 (5%) in Stage IV. Thirty-six patients (90%) were treated with external beam therapy and some combination of implant: cylinder, ovoid, or interstitial implants with iodine-125 or iridium-192 (afterloading). Only 4 patients (10%) received treatment by implant only.
RESULTS: Based on their response, two groups of patients were identified. Group I had 23 patients with tumors predominantly located in the proximal half of the vagina; there were 8 patients in Stage I, 11 in Stage II, 3 in Stage III, and 1 in Stage IV. Of these, three patients failed: one each in Stages III and IV and one Stage II patient was salvaged by surgery. Three patients died due to unrelated causes but with local control. The 5-year actuarial survival in this group was 81%. Group II had 17 patients with tumors located in the mid to distal half of the vagina; there were 5 patients in Stage I, 10 in Stage II, and 2 in Stage IV. Ten patients failed. Eight patients in Stage II had persistent disease, were lost to follow-up, and are presumed dead. Two patients with Stage IV disease also had inadequate local control. The overall actuarial survival in the distal group was 41%, which was significantly worse than the proximal group (81%), at a P value of 0.05.
CONCLUSIONS: This study discusses the curability of carcinoma of the vagina based on its anatomic location when predominantly similar treatment techniques and radiation doses were applied to either the proximal or the distal part of the vagina, those with cancer in the proximal half had better survival (81%) than those whose cancer was in the distal half (41%).
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app