We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Current results of intestinal transplantation. The International Intestinal Transplant Registry.
Lancet 1996 June 30
BACKGROUND: Intestinal transplantation is an alternative to total parenteral nutrition (TPN) for the treatment of chronic intestinal failure. To determine the current status of small-bowel transplantation, we have reviewed the world experience since 1985.
METHODS: We built up an international registry by asking twenty-five intestinal transplantation programmes to submit standard data on their cases operated on between 1985 and June, 1995.
FINDINGS: One centre (two transplantations) did not use our report form, and these cases were excluded. The remaining twenty-four programmes did 180 transplantations in 170 patients. Two-thirds of the recipients were children. The main indication (64 percent) was short-gut syndrome, another 13 percent had a tumour. Of the grafts, 38 percent were small-bowel with or without colon, 46 percent were intestine plus liver, and 16 percent were multivisceral. Graft/patients' survival (percent) at 1 and 3 years under cyclosporin immunosuppression was, respectively: 17/57 and 11/50 for small bowel only; 44/44 and 28/28 for intestine plus liver; and 41/41 and 41/41 for multiviscera. The corresponding figures under tacrolimus were: 65/83 and 29/47; 64/66 and 38/40; and 51/59 and 37/43. 78 percent of the 86 survivors had stopped TPN and resumed oral nutrition.
INTERPRETATION: Our approach cannot give data on long-term outcome. The short-term results of intestinal transplantation are similar to those of lung grafting. We conclude that small-bowel transplantation has become a life-saving option for patients who cannot be maintained on TPN and for those who require massive abdominal evisceration for locally aggressive tumours.
METHODS: We built up an international registry by asking twenty-five intestinal transplantation programmes to submit standard data on their cases operated on between 1985 and June, 1995.
FINDINGS: One centre (two transplantations) did not use our report form, and these cases were excluded. The remaining twenty-four programmes did 180 transplantations in 170 patients. Two-thirds of the recipients were children. The main indication (64 percent) was short-gut syndrome, another 13 percent had a tumour. Of the grafts, 38 percent were small-bowel with or without colon, 46 percent were intestine plus liver, and 16 percent were multivisceral. Graft/patients' survival (percent) at 1 and 3 years under cyclosporin immunosuppression was, respectively: 17/57 and 11/50 for small bowel only; 44/44 and 28/28 for intestine plus liver; and 41/41 and 41/41 for multiviscera. The corresponding figures under tacrolimus were: 65/83 and 29/47; 64/66 and 38/40; and 51/59 and 37/43. 78 percent of the 86 survivors had stopped TPN and resumed oral nutrition.
INTERPRETATION: Our approach cannot give data on long-term outcome. The short-term results of intestinal transplantation are similar to those of lung grafting. We conclude that small-bowel transplantation has become a life-saving option for patients who cannot be maintained on TPN and for those who require massive abdominal evisceration for locally aggressive tumours.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app