We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Overview of randomized clinical trials of oral branched-chain amino acid treatment in chronic hepatic encephalopathy.
BACKGROUND: The role of oral branched-chain amino acid supplements in the prevention and treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy is not yet established, and conflicting opinions are expressed in authoritative textbooks. We aimed to review and pool the published controlled studies by means of meta-analytical techniques.
METHODS: A computerized search of published papers identified nine studies, controlled against placebo, energy, alimentary proteins, or casein. Their quality score was calculated according to the protocol of Chalmers. The value of the portal-systemic encephalopathy index was chosen as main outcome, because of lack of more significant clinical outcomes. To cope with differences in trial design and data presentation, individual data were requested to authors.
RESULTS: After 18 months, we received the individual data of only two studies, thus precluding any meta-analysis. Two studies, accounting for over 60% of total enrolled patients, were in favor of branched-chain amino acids. Their quality score was much better than that of the remaining seven negative small studies, carrying a significant risk of type II error.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the two largest, long-term studies, the use of oral branched-chain amino acids in the prevention and treatment of chronic encephalopathy may only be proposed for patients with advanced cirrhosis, intolerant to alimentary proteins. Large, multicenter, long-term studies, considering more important clinical outcomes, are needed to provide definite answers to an aged question.
METHODS: A computerized search of published papers identified nine studies, controlled against placebo, energy, alimentary proteins, or casein. Their quality score was calculated according to the protocol of Chalmers. The value of the portal-systemic encephalopathy index was chosen as main outcome, because of lack of more significant clinical outcomes. To cope with differences in trial design and data presentation, individual data were requested to authors.
RESULTS: After 18 months, we received the individual data of only two studies, thus precluding any meta-analysis. Two studies, accounting for over 60% of total enrolled patients, were in favor of branched-chain amino acids. Their quality score was much better than that of the remaining seven negative small studies, carrying a significant risk of type II error.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of the two largest, long-term studies, the use of oral branched-chain amino acids in the prevention and treatment of chronic encephalopathy may only be proposed for patients with advanced cirrhosis, intolerant to alimentary proteins. Large, multicenter, long-term studies, considering more important clinical outcomes, are needed to provide definite answers to an aged question.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app