We have located links that may give you full text access.
Aortic root replacement with the pulmonary autograft in children with complex left heart obstruction.
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 1996 August
BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical treatment of complex (multiple level or recurrent) left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) in infancy is controversial. Staged procedures expose the children to the need for reoperation, and currently available techniques of aortoventriculoplasty are associated with the morbidities of biological and mechanical prostheses.
METHODS: Between July 1992 and January 1996, we have performed 24 aortic root replacements with the pulmonary autograft in pediatric patients (< 18 years). Of this group, 8 were infants and children with complex LVOTO aged 9 days to 22 months (mean, 8.6 +/- 8 months) and weighing 3.3 to 10.2 kg (mean, 6.3 +/- 2.6 kg). The diagnoses were interrupted aortic arch/ventricular septal defect/subaortic stenosis in 3, recurrent aortic stenosis in 2, aortic stenosis and subaortic stenosis in 1, and aortic stenosis/subaortic stenosis/mitral stenosis/regurgitation in 2. All patients had undergone one to three previous operative procedures (mean, 1.5 +/- 0.8 procedures/patient). Preoperative echocardiographic peak LVOT gradient was 71.7 +/- 25 mm Hg (range, 40 to 110 mm Hg) and aortic annulus size was 7.2 +/- 2.3 mm (range, 4 to 10.6 mm). The surgical technique included replacement of the aortic root with the pulmonary autograft combined with incision of the conal septum to relieve subaortic stenosis or accommodate for size discrepancy between the aortic and pulmonary autograft root and a pulmonary homograft placed in the right ventricular outflow tract.
RESULTS: There were no perioperative or late deaths at follow-up (range, 2 to 25 months; mean, 13.5 +/- 8 months). Mean hospital stay was 15 +/- 17 days (range, 4 to 53 days). Three children had the following complications: diaphragmatic paresis (1), delayed pericardial effusion (1), and atrioventricular block requiring a pacemaker (1). In follow-up, echocardiographic findings showed absent aortic regurgitation in 3 and trivial aortic regurgitation in 5, and no significant LVOTO (mean peak gradient, 6.2 +/- 7.6 mm Hg; range, 0 to 16 mm Hg). Pulmonary homograft regurgitation was absent in 5, trivial in 2, and moderate in 1. Peak right ventricular outflow tract gradient by echocardiogram was trivial in 7, and a significant gradient of 55 mm Hg has developed in 1 infant. There were no infective or embolic complications during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that aortic root replacement with the pulmonary autograft can be performed in children with excellent clinical results. The technique of root replacement combined with ventriculoplasty allows definitive and simultaneous relief of complex and multiple-level obstructive lesions. Considering the growth potential of the pulmonary autograft, this should be regarded as the optimal treatment modality in infants with complex LVOTO:
METHODS: Between July 1992 and January 1996, we have performed 24 aortic root replacements with the pulmonary autograft in pediatric patients (< 18 years). Of this group, 8 were infants and children with complex LVOTO aged 9 days to 22 months (mean, 8.6 +/- 8 months) and weighing 3.3 to 10.2 kg (mean, 6.3 +/- 2.6 kg). The diagnoses were interrupted aortic arch/ventricular septal defect/subaortic stenosis in 3, recurrent aortic stenosis in 2, aortic stenosis and subaortic stenosis in 1, and aortic stenosis/subaortic stenosis/mitral stenosis/regurgitation in 2. All patients had undergone one to three previous operative procedures (mean, 1.5 +/- 0.8 procedures/patient). Preoperative echocardiographic peak LVOT gradient was 71.7 +/- 25 mm Hg (range, 40 to 110 mm Hg) and aortic annulus size was 7.2 +/- 2.3 mm (range, 4 to 10.6 mm). The surgical technique included replacement of the aortic root with the pulmonary autograft combined with incision of the conal septum to relieve subaortic stenosis or accommodate for size discrepancy between the aortic and pulmonary autograft root and a pulmonary homograft placed in the right ventricular outflow tract.
RESULTS: There were no perioperative or late deaths at follow-up (range, 2 to 25 months; mean, 13.5 +/- 8 months). Mean hospital stay was 15 +/- 17 days (range, 4 to 53 days). Three children had the following complications: diaphragmatic paresis (1), delayed pericardial effusion (1), and atrioventricular block requiring a pacemaker (1). In follow-up, echocardiographic findings showed absent aortic regurgitation in 3 and trivial aortic regurgitation in 5, and no significant LVOTO (mean peak gradient, 6.2 +/- 7.6 mm Hg; range, 0 to 16 mm Hg). Pulmonary homograft regurgitation was absent in 5, trivial in 2, and moderate in 1. Peak right ventricular outflow tract gradient by echocardiogram was trivial in 7, and a significant gradient of 55 mm Hg has developed in 1 infant. There were no infective or embolic complications during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that aortic root replacement with the pulmonary autograft can be performed in children with excellent clinical results. The technique of root replacement combined with ventriculoplasty allows definitive and simultaneous relief of complex and multiple-level obstructive lesions. Considering the growth potential of the pulmonary autograft, this should be regarded as the optimal treatment modality in infants with complex LVOTO:
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app