We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Forceful epidural injections for the treatment of lumbosciatic pain with post-operative lumbar spinal fibrosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of forceful epidural corticosteroid injections in lumbosciatic pain ascribed to post-operative lumbar spinal fibrosis.
METHOD: Randomized controlled study comparing forceful injections via the sacral hiatus of 125 mg prednisolone acetate + 40 ml saline (treatment group) and injections via the same route of 125 mg prednisolone acetate alone (control group). Results were compared after six and 18 months. The main evaluation criterion was a subjective assessment of overall efficacy done by the patient using a seven-level scale.
RESULTS: After six months, the proportion of patients who were relieved of their sciatica was significantly higher in the forceful injection group (n = 29; 45%) than in the control group (n = 31; 19%) (p = 0.03). Success rates for low back pain were 29% and 6% in the forceful injection and control groups, respectively. Among secondary efficacy criteria, nerve root pain evaluated on a visual analog scale and by Schöber's index showed significantly greater improvement in the forceful injection group than in the control group. After 18 months, results were still in favor of the forceful injection group, with success rates of 39% for the sciatica and 31% for the low back pain. The proportion of patients who returned to work was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Although mediocre overall, the results of forceful epidural corticosteroid injections are better than those of simple epidural injections of a corticosteroid alone. Given the paucity of effective treatments for lumbosciatic pain apparently due to postoperative fibrosis, forceful injections should be given a place in the treatment of this condition.
METHOD: Randomized controlled study comparing forceful injections via the sacral hiatus of 125 mg prednisolone acetate + 40 ml saline (treatment group) and injections via the same route of 125 mg prednisolone acetate alone (control group). Results were compared after six and 18 months. The main evaluation criterion was a subjective assessment of overall efficacy done by the patient using a seven-level scale.
RESULTS: After six months, the proportion of patients who were relieved of their sciatica was significantly higher in the forceful injection group (n = 29; 45%) than in the control group (n = 31; 19%) (p = 0.03). Success rates for low back pain were 29% and 6% in the forceful injection and control groups, respectively. Among secondary efficacy criteria, nerve root pain evaluated on a visual analog scale and by Schöber's index showed significantly greater improvement in the forceful injection group than in the control group. After 18 months, results were still in favor of the forceful injection group, with success rates of 39% for the sciatica and 31% for the low back pain. The proportion of patients who returned to work was similar in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Although mediocre overall, the results of forceful epidural corticosteroid injections are better than those of simple epidural injections of a corticosteroid alone. Given the paucity of effective treatments for lumbosciatic pain apparently due to postoperative fibrosis, forceful injections should be given a place in the treatment of this condition.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app