We have located links that may give you full text access.
Effect of foot and ankle MR imaging on clinical decision making.
Radiology 1996 November
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the ankle and hindfoot on clinical decision making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients were prospectively examined with MR imaging of the foot and ankle. The referring clinician (one of two orthopedic surgeons or one of two podiatrists) assigned a clinical diagnosis (with a corresponding confidence score of 1-5) and a tentative treatment plan before and after the MR imaging examination and reading. A two-tailed, paired Student t test was used to determine the effects of MR imaging on the diagnosis and treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 81 patients examined, 38 (47%) had a post-MR imaging diagnosis that differed from the pre-MR imaging diagnosis (P < .001). Treatment plans were subsequently changed in 28 patients (34%) (P < .001). MR imaging had a statistically significant effect regardless of the assigned, pre-MR imaging clinical confidence rating. MR imaging was also noted to play a key role in surgical planning regardless of the effect on diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the foot and ankle has an effect on clinical decision making. Regardless of the clinician's confidence in diagnosis, MR imaging consistently plays a central role in further defining the diagnosis and treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive patients were prospectively examined with MR imaging of the foot and ankle. The referring clinician (one of two orthopedic surgeons or one of two podiatrists) assigned a clinical diagnosis (with a corresponding confidence score of 1-5) and a tentative treatment plan before and after the MR imaging examination and reading. A two-tailed, paired Student t test was used to determine the effects of MR imaging on the diagnosis and treatment.
RESULTS: Of the 81 patients examined, 38 (47%) had a post-MR imaging diagnosis that differed from the pre-MR imaging diagnosis (P < .001). Treatment plans were subsequently changed in 28 patients (34%) (P < .001). MR imaging had a statistically significant effect regardless of the assigned, pre-MR imaging clinical confidence rating. MR imaging was also noted to play a key role in surgical planning regardless of the effect on diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the foot and ankle has an effect on clinical decision making. Regardless of the clinician's confidence in diagnosis, MR imaging consistently plays a central role in further defining the diagnosis and treatment.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app