We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on digital chest images: the role of expertise and image enhancement.
Academic Radiology 1996 October
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine whether observer performance in the localization of tubes and catheters on computed radiography (CR) chest images can be improved by using an automatic image-processing algorithm.
METHODS: Comparisons were made of CR hard-copy, CR soft-copy, and CR enhanced soft-copy images obtained with an image-processing algorithm. The enhanced images used gray-level optimization and nonlinear unsharp masking to emphasize the edges of the devices. Chest radiologists (n = 4), general radiologists (n = 4), and interns (n = 6) read 45 images that contained endotracheal tubes, pulmonary artery catheters, and central venous catheters.
RESULTS: Chest radiologists had the smallest mean interobserver localization variability (4 mm), followed by general radiologists (6 mm) and interns (8 mm). Localization variability was greatest for hard-copy images and least for enhanced soft-copy images.
CONCLUSION: Use of an automatic imaging-processing algorithm reduced localization variability and enabled the medical interns to perform at approximately the same level as the chest radiologists.
METHODS: Comparisons were made of CR hard-copy, CR soft-copy, and CR enhanced soft-copy images obtained with an image-processing algorithm. The enhanced images used gray-level optimization and nonlinear unsharp masking to emphasize the edges of the devices. Chest radiologists (n = 4), general radiologists (n = 4), and interns (n = 6) read 45 images that contained endotracheal tubes, pulmonary artery catheters, and central venous catheters.
RESULTS: Chest radiologists had the smallest mean interobserver localization variability (4 mm), followed by general radiologists (6 mm) and interns (8 mm). Localization variability was greatest for hard-copy images and least for enhanced soft-copy images.
CONCLUSION: Use of an automatic imaging-processing algorithm reduced localization variability and enabled the medical interns to perform at approximately the same level as the chest radiologists.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app