We have located links that may give you full text access.
Slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtering blebs using mitomycin C.
Ophthalmology 1996 November
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Mitomycin C (MMC) augmented slit-lamp needle revision of failed filtration surgery.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 62 patients (62 eyes) (age, 72 +/- 15 years) with failed filtration surgery who underwent needle revision using MMC. A mixture of 0.01 ml of MMC (0.4 mg/ml) and 0.02 ml of bupivacaine with epinephrine was injected subconjunctivally. Twenty to 30 minutes later, a 30-gauge needle was used to perforate the area of subconjunctival fibrosis and re-establish flow.
RESULTS: Overall, 118 needing procedures (mean, 1.9 +/- 1.4 revisions per eye; range, 1-7) were performed on 62 eyes (mean follow-up, 9.9 +/- 3.7 months; range, 4.5-20.1 months). Thirty-six patients (58.1%) were needled once and 26 patients (41.9%) underwent more than 1 needling procedure. Intraocular pressure decreased from 24.1 +/- 6.4 mmHg (range, 18-44) before surgery to 11.5 +/- 4.8 mmHg (range, 1-26) at last follow-up (P = 5.51 x 10(-21)). Antiglaucoma medications decreased from 1.6 +/- 1.0 to 0.3 +/- 0.6 (P = 3.8 x 10(-14)). Successful single-needling procedure was highly correlated with race (white) and past conventional glaucoma filtration surgery of more than 4 years. Complications included serous choroidal detachment (10 eyes), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (1 eye), bleb leak (5 eyes), iris blocking sclerostomy (2 eyes), hyphema (2 eyes), corneal abrasion (2 eyes), and hypotony (1 eye).
CONCLUSION: Mitomycin needle revision appears to be an extremely effective way to revive failed filtration surgery. The incidence of complications compares favorably to trabeculectomy with MMC.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 62 patients (62 eyes) (age, 72 +/- 15 years) with failed filtration surgery who underwent needle revision using MMC. A mixture of 0.01 ml of MMC (0.4 mg/ml) and 0.02 ml of bupivacaine with epinephrine was injected subconjunctivally. Twenty to 30 minutes later, a 30-gauge needle was used to perforate the area of subconjunctival fibrosis and re-establish flow.
RESULTS: Overall, 118 needing procedures (mean, 1.9 +/- 1.4 revisions per eye; range, 1-7) were performed on 62 eyes (mean follow-up, 9.9 +/- 3.7 months; range, 4.5-20.1 months). Thirty-six patients (58.1%) were needled once and 26 patients (41.9%) underwent more than 1 needling procedure. Intraocular pressure decreased from 24.1 +/- 6.4 mmHg (range, 18-44) before surgery to 11.5 +/- 4.8 mmHg (range, 1-26) at last follow-up (P = 5.51 x 10(-21)). Antiglaucoma medications decreased from 1.6 +/- 1.0 to 0.3 +/- 0.6 (P = 3.8 x 10(-14)). Successful single-needling procedure was highly correlated with race (white) and past conventional glaucoma filtration surgery of more than 4 years. Complications included serous choroidal detachment (10 eyes), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (1 eye), bleb leak (5 eyes), iris blocking sclerostomy (2 eyes), hyphema (2 eyes), corneal abrasion (2 eyes), and hypotony (1 eye).
CONCLUSION: Mitomycin needle revision appears to be an extremely effective way to revive failed filtration surgery. The incidence of complications compares favorably to trabeculectomy with MMC.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app