We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Combining medical and mechanical methods of cervical ripening. Does it increase the likelihood of successful induction of labor?
Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1996 November
OBJECTIVE: To determine if combining two commonly used methods or cervical ripening (intracervical prostaglandin E2 [Pge2] gel and Foley balloon catheter) would result in a higher number of successful inductions and fewer cesarean sections when compared to PGE2 gel alone.
STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-eight patients with unfavorable cervixes eligible for induction of labor were prospectively randomized to receive either one dose (0.5 mg) of PGE2 gel followed by insertion of a 24-French Foley catheter (group 1, 41 patients) or two doses of 0.5 mg of intracervical gel (group 2, 37 patients). Outcome parameters included change in Bishop score, number of failed inductions, rate of cesarean section, rate of uterine hyperstimulation and postpartum infection.
RESULTS: Patients in group 1 had a significant increase in posttreatment Bishop scores (7.26 +/- 2.0 SD vs. 4.82 +/- 1.8 P = .0001) and fewer failed inductions (0 vs. 6, P = .009) when compared to patients in group 2. Abdominal delivery rates, uterine hyperstimulation and infections complications were not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The combination of the Foley balloon and prostaglandin gel significantly improved the Bishop score and led to fewer failed inductions, although it did not increase the vaginal delivery rate.
STUDY DESIGN: Seventy-eight patients with unfavorable cervixes eligible for induction of labor were prospectively randomized to receive either one dose (0.5 mg) of PGE2 gel followed by insertion of a 24-French Foley catheter (group 1, 41 patients) or two doses of 0.5 mg of intracervical gel (group 2, 37 patients). Outcome parameters included change in Bishop score, number of failed inductions, rate of cesarean section, rate of uterine hyperstimulation and postpartum infection.
RESULTS: Patients in group 1 had a significant increase in posttreatment Bishop scores (7.26 +/- 2.0 SD vs. 4.82 +/- 1.8 P = .0001) and fewer failed inductions (0 vs. 6, P = .009) when compared to patients in group 2. Abdominal delivery rates, uterine hyperstimulation and infections complications were not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The combination of the Foley balloon and prostaglandin gel significantly improved the Bishop score and led to fewer failed inductions, although it did not increase the vaginal delivery rate.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app