Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Microbiologic factors and visual outcome in the endophthalmitis vitrectomy study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between microbiologic factors, effect of treatment, and visual outcome in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.

METHODS: Four hundred twenty patients were enrolled in the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study between February 1990 and January 1994. Of these, 394 completed 9 to 12 months of follow-up. Patients presented with features of bacterial endophthalmitis within 6 weeks of cataract extraction or secondary intraocular lens implantation. The relations between visual outcome and the identity of infecting species, gram stain results, antibiotic susceptibilities, and presence of vitrectomy cassette growth were examined.

RESULTS: Rates of achieving final visual acuity of 20/100 or better for the more common isolates were as follows: gram-positive, coagulase-negative micrococci, 84%; Staphylococcus aureus, 50%; streptococci, 30%; enterococci, 14%; and gram-negative organisms, 56%. A positive gram stain or infection with species other than gram-positive, coagulase-negative micrococci were significantly associated with poorer visual outcome (P < .001 for species group comparisons). However, presenting visual acuity was more powerful than microbiologic factors in predicting visual outcome and favorable response to vitrectomy. Bacterial growth from the vitrectomy cassette specimen had prognostic significance equivalent to growth from other intraocular sources.

CONCLUSIONS: Visual prognosis was strongly associated with the type of infecting organism and gram stain positivity. However, visual acuity at initial presentation appeared to be more useful than microbiologic factors in predicting visual outcome and judging the value of immediate vitrectomy in acute bacterial endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app