Split-liver transplantation. The Paul Brousse policy.

OBJECTIVE: The authors objective is to report their recent experience with split-liver transplantation, focusing on the results and the impact on organ shortage.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There is an insufficient number of organs for liver transplantation. Split-liver transplantation is a method to increase the number of grafts, but the procedure is slow to gain wide acceptance because of its complexity and the poor results reported in previous series.

METHODS: During the year 1995, the authors split 20 of 83 transplantable livers allocated to the authors' center, generating 40 grafts: 23 were transplanted locally and 17 were given to partner centers. During the same period, the authors accepted four split-liver grafts proposed to them by other centers. Overall, 27 split-liver transplantations were done in the authors' unit, accounting for 30% of the 90 transplants performed in 1995.

RESULTS: One-year patient and graft survival rates for split-liver transplantation were 79.4% and 78.5%, respectively. Arterial and biliary complications rates were 15% and 22%, respectively, with none leading to graft loss. Primary nonfunction occurred in one case (4%). By splitting 24 of 87 transplantable livers (4 of which were in partner units), a total of 111 transplantations were performed, increasing graft availability by 28%.

CONCLUSIONS: Split-liver transplantation is achieving graft and patient survival rates similar to that of whole liver transplantation despite a higher incidence of complications, which could become less frequent as experience is gained with this procedure. A wider acceptance of split-liver transplantation could markedly increase the supply of liver grafts.