We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Validation of thermography in the diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy.
Clinical Journal of Pain 1996 December
OBJECTIVES: To examine the validity of several thermogram-derived indices of autonomic functioning in the diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD).
DESIGN: A series of chronic pain patients were classified diagnostically based on thermogram results using discriminant function analysis, and validity measures (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) were used to determine the accuracy of computerized thermographic pixel analysis in discriminating RSD from other pathology.
SETTING: The study was conducted at the Rush Pain Center, a multidisciplinary outpatient pain clinic.
PATIENTS: A series of 46 chronic pain patients referred for suspected sympathetically mediated pain.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent computerized thermographic examination under a baseline condition after acclimating to a climate-controlled room, immediately after a cold challenge was applied to the contralateral uninvolved extremity (4 degrees C for 90 s) and 20 min after the cold challenge.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Temperature during the three experimental periods, degree of temperature asymmetry between affected and nonaffected limbs during the three periods, response to cold challenge, and recovery following cold challenge were measured.
RESULTS: Temperature asymmetry accurately discriminated between RSD and non-RSD patients, with the most accurate asymmetry measures obtained at baseline. Responses to cold challenge and actual temperature values did not discriminate between RSD and non-RSD pain patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Thermography can be a useful component of RSD diagnosis. In situations where sensitivity and specificity are equally important, an asymmetry cutoff of 0.6 degree C appears optimal. If specificity (i.e., accurately ruling out non-RSD cases) is more important, a cutoff of 0.8 degree C or 1.0 degree C may be considered as well.
DESIGN: A series of chronic pain patients were classified diagnostically based on thermogram results using discriminant function analysis, and validity measures (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) were used to determine the accuracy of computerized thermographic pixel analysis in discriminating RSD from other pathology.
SETTING: The study was conducted at the Rush Pain Center, a multidisciplinary outpatient pain clinic.
PATIENTS: A series of 46 chronic pain patients referred for suspected sympathetically mediated pain.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent computerized thermographic examination under a baseline condition after acclimating to a climate-controlled room, immediately after a cold challenge was applied to the contralateral uninvolved extremity (4 degrees C for 90 s) and 20 min after the cold challenge.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Temperature during the three experimental periods, degree of temperature asymmetry between affected and nonaffected limbs during the three periods, response to cold challenge, and recovery following cold challenge were measured.
RESULTS: Temperature asymmetry accurately discriminated between RSD and non-RSD patients, with the most accurate asymmetry measures obtained at baseline. Responses to cold challenge and actual temperature values did not discriminate between RSD and non-RSD pain patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Thermography can be a useful component of RSD diagnosis. In situations where sensitivity and specificity are equally important, an asymmetry cutoff of 0.6 degree C appears optimal. If specificity (i.e., accurately ruling out non-RSD cases) is more important, a cutoff of 0.8 degree C or 1.0 degree C may be considered as well.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app