We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Controlled Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Growth hormone (GH)-deficient men are more responsive to GH replacement therapy than women.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1997 Februrary
Thirty-six patients with adult-onset GH deficiency (GHD) were examined before and after 9 months of treatment with recombinant GH. The study was conducted as a double blind, placebo-controlled, 21-month trial with a cross-over design, with each treatment period lasting for 9 months. The same dose, adjusted for body surface area, was given to men (n = 21) and women (n = 15), and the effects on body composition and biochemical parameters were evaluated with respect to gender. The extent of GHD, assessed before therapy from basal GH secretion and GH release in response to provocative tests, did not differ between the two groups. The men, however, had higher serum insulin-like growth factor I concentrations than the women (mean +/- SD, 126 +/- 71 vs. 61 +/- 32 micrograms/L; P = 0.0003), less body fat, and greater lean body mass. Upon treatment, insulin-like growth factor I concentrations increased more in men than in women (by 305 +/- 136 and 198 +/- 96 micrograms/L, respectively; P = 0.02). The men lost more body fat than the women (7.4 +/- 4.1% vs. 3.3 +/- 3.8%; P = 0.002), whereas the difference in gain in lean body mass failed to reach statistical significance. Serum levels of total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 decreased in the male group (P = 0.003, P = 0.03, P = 0.0009, and P = 0.01, respectively), but not in the females. Serum markers of bone formation, namely osteocalcin, procollagen type I, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and a marker of bone resorption, telopeptide of collagen type I, increased more markedly in men than in women. Lipoprotein(a) increased to a similar extent in the male and female groups. The data demonstrate that men and women with GHD display marked differences in their responsiveness to GH replacement therapy. These differences should be taken into consideration when optimizing the treatment of GHD patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app