We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Population screening for haemochromatosis: a unifying analysis of published intervention trials.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the efficacy of population screening for haemochromatosis by analysing the screening performance of seven intervention trials, and to compare this with the expected performance derived from family studies.
SETTING: Seven population intervention trials carried out between 1983 and 1995 in Australia, Scandinavia, Iceland, and the United State.
METHODS: Seven of 23 English language trials identified were suitable for the meta-analysis. Transferrin saturation and serum ferritin measurements derived from family studies were used to predict detection and false positive rates for each trial.
RESULTS: The seven trials used various screening and diagnostic criteria. A total of 18,396 men and 12,254 women were screened. Because some cases were not detected by screening, and some screen positive individuals did not complete diagnostic testing, the prevalence of homozygous individuals was underestimated in all the trials. The reported and predicted percentages of screen positive individuals nearly always agreed. The homozygote prevalence was estimated to be 34 men and 40 women per 10,000 (prevalence predicted from family studies is 53 per 10,000). Clinical manifestations were present in 50% of male and 44% of female homozygotes.
CONCLUSIONS: False positive rates, homozygote prevalences, and frequency of clinical manifestations were in general agreement with predictions from family studies. However, incomplete understanding about a number of issues requires that further pilot trials be carried out before screening can be considered part of routine medical practice.
SETTING: Seven population intervention trials carried out between 1983 and 1995 in Australia, Scandinavia, Iceland, and the United State.
METHODS: Seven of 23 English language trials identified were suitable for the meta-analysis. Transferrin saturation and serum ferritin measurements derived from family studies were used to predict detection and false positive rates for each trial.
RESULTS: The seven trials used various screening and diagnostic criteria. A total of 18,396 men and 12,254 women were screened. Because some cases were not detected by screening, and some screen positive individuals did not complete diagnostic testing, the prevalence of homozygous individuals was underestimated in all the trials. The reported and predicted percentages of screen positive individuals nearly always agreed. The homozygote prevalence was estimated to be 34 men and 40 women per 10,000 (prevalence predicted from family studies is 53 per 10,000). Clinical manifestations were present in 50% of male and 44% of female homozygotes.
CONCLUSIONS: False positive rates, homozygote prevalences, and frequency of clinical manifestations were in general agreement with predictions from family studies. However, incomplete understanding about a number of issues requires that further pilot trials be carried out before screening can be considered part of routine medical practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app