We have located links that may give you full text access.
Plasmapheresis in toxic epidermal necrolysis.
International Journal of Dermatology 1997 March
BACKGROUND: The treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is usually based on the removal of the offending drug(s), fluid replacement, nutritional support, and local management. The mortality and morbidity, however, remain high and the death rate may be reduced to 10% only in special centers that use biologic dressings. Plasma exchange (PE) was proven efficacious in small series of patients and of no particular value in others.
METHODS: Seven patients suffering from severe TEN covering 30%-80% of body surface area and having two or four mucous membranes involved, were included in this open study. Malignancy (Hodgkin's disease, brain tumor) and a variety of medicaments (carbamazepine, allopurinol, diphenylhydantoin, cefaclor, amoxicyllin with clavullanic acid) were considered as causally implicated. One to four PEs of 2.5 L were given on alternate days in six patients and on a daily basis in the seventh.
RESULTS: All patients recovered successfully from their disease. No new lesions appeared after the first PE in four patients. Neither adverse reactions from this therapy nor sequelae from TEN were observed after a long follow-up lasting up to 8 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Although PE is expensive and requires easy venous access to be performed, it could be listed in the first line of TEN therapy. The method is safe and efficacious, providing prompt relief from pain and rapid cessation of necrolysis. The alternate day PEs are considered preferable to the everyday regimen.
METHODS: Seven patients suffering from severe TEN covering 30%-80% of body surface area and having two or four mucous membranes involved, were included in this open study. Malignancy (Hodgkin's disease, brain tumor) and a variety of medicaments (carbamazepine, allopurinol, diphenylhydantoin, cefaclor, amoxicyllin with clavullanic acid) were considered as causally implicated. One to four PEs of 2.5 L were given on alternate days in six patients and on a daily basis in the seventh.
RESULTS: All patients recovered successfully from their disease. No new lesions appeared after the first PE in four patients. Neither adverse reactions from this therapy nor sequelae from TEN were observed after a long follow-up lasting up to 8 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Although PE is expensive and requires easy venous access to be performed, it could be listed in the first line of TEN therapy. The method is safe and efficacious, providing prompt relief from pain and rapid cessation of necrolysis. The alternate day PEs are considered preferable to the everyday regimen.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app