We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Contrast enhanced Gd-DTPA magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis during a clinical trial with DMARDs. A prospective two-year follow-up study on hand joints in 31 patients.
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 1997 March
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective 24-month follow-up study was to compare clinical features with radiological and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in evaluating synovial proliferation in the hand joints of 31 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A single joint was used for the follow-up of each patient.
METHODS: Thirty-one small hand joints were examined by conventional radiography and MRI before and after 24 months of treatment. MRI assessment of disease progression (volume and/or signal intensity of the synovial proliferation on T1 weighted precontrast, T1 weighted postcontrast and T2 weighted images) was compared with a clinical assessment of the chosen joints, and with a plain x-ray film evaluation (Larsen's score).
RESULTS: Of 26 joints which clinically improved (14 markedly and 14 slightly) during the study, on MRI 16 showed improvement, 8 showed no change, and 2 showed deterioration. Four clinically unchanged joints appeared improved on MRI. One joint deteriorated clinically and on MRI. Overall, there was a 58% congruence between clinical and MRI findings. On x-ray 23 joints showed no change; nine of these were also unchanged on MRI, while 13 showed improvement and one deterioration. Only in 2 out of 8 joints showing deterioration on x-ray were the MRI findings in accordance. In the remaining six joints MRI showed improvement. The congruence between x-ray and MRI was therefore 36%.
CONCLUSION: The long-term follow-up of rheumatoid synovial proliferation of the small joints in the hand using contrast enhanced MRI is feasible and may provide additional information regarding disease activity. Important advantages over conventional radiography methods are its ability to demonstrate qualitative differences of synovial proliferation within bone erosions, and demonstrate not only deterioration, but also the improvement of inflammatory disease.
METHODS: Thirty-one small hand joints were examined by conventional radiography and MRI before and after 24 months of treatment. MRI assessment of disease progression (volume and/or signal intensity of the synovial proliferation on T1 weighted precontrast, T1 weighted postcontrast and T2 weighted images) was compared with a clinical assessment of the chosen joints, and with a plain x-ray film evaluation (Larsen's score).
RESULTS: Of 26 joints which clinically improved (14 markedly and 14 slightly) during the study, on MRI 16 showed improvement, 8 showed no change, and 2 showed deterioration. Four clinically unchanged joints appeared improved on MRI. One joint deteriorated clinically and on MRI. Overall, there was a 58% congruence between clinical and MRI findings. On x-ray 23 joints showed no change; nine of these were also unchanged on MRI, while 13 showed improvement and one deterioration. Only in 2 out of 8 joints showing deterioration on x-ray were the MRI findings in accordance. In the remaining six joints MRI showed improvement. The congruence between x-ray and MRI was therefore 36%.
CONCLUSION: The long-term follow-up of rheumatoid synovial proliferation of the small joints in the hand using contrast enhanced MRI is feasible and may provide additional information regarding disease activity. Important advantages over conventional radiography methods are its ability to demonstrate qualitative differences of synovial proliferation within bone erosions, and demonstrate not only deterioration, but also the improvement of inflammatory disease.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app