We have located links that may give you full text access.
Posterior arthrodesis in the skeletally immature patient. Assessing the risk for crankshaft: is an open triradiate cartilage the answer?
Spine 1997 June 16
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three skeletally immature patients younger than 12 years of age and having posterior arthrodesis and evidence of solid posterior fusion without "adding on" were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up.
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain factors associated with crankshaft and to determine how accurate a marker the triradiate cartilage was.
SUMMARY OF DATA: All patients had Risser Stage 0 curves and all of the girls were premenarchal preoperatively. The average age was 9 years 3 months (range, 2 years-11 years 11 months). Preoperative diagnoses consisted of 14 idiopathic, 11 congenital, five dysplastic, and three neuromuscular etiologies.
METHODS: Preoperatively, within 3 months after surgery, and at 2-year, 5-year, and final postoperative follow-up, the following radiographic parameters were reviewed: coronal Cobb, apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral translation, rib vertebral angle difference, and trunkshift.
RESULTS: The triradiate cartilage was open in 24 patients at the time of operation. Of those 24, only nine (37.5%) had documented proof of crankshaft. Patients with closed triradiate cartilage had no significant postoperative increase in radiographic parameters (0 of 9). The subgroup of patients with idiopathic scoliosis had an average age of 11 years 3 months (range, 9 years 2 months-11 years 11 months). Five of 14 patients had an open triradiate cartilage. All were followed up to skeletal maturity. None had significant progression in postoperative radiographic parameters.
CONCLUSION: This study did not find an open triradiate cartilage to be an absolute prognostic indicator for the occurrence of crankshaft. Additional refinement of markers of maturity are needed to determine who requires anterior arthrodesis.
OBJECTIVES: To ascertain factors associated with crankshaft and to determine how accurate a marker the triradiate cartilage was.
SUMMARY OF DATA: All patients had Risser Stage 0 curves and all of the girls were premenarchal preoperatively. The average age was 9 years 3 months (range, 2 years-11 years 11 months). Preoperative diagnoses consisted of 14 idiopathic, 11 congenital, five dysplastic, and three neuromuscular etiologies.
METHODS: Preoperatively, within 3 months after surgery, and at 2-year, 5-year, and final postoperative follow-up, the following radiographic parameters were reviewed: coronal Cobb, apical vertebral rotation, apical vertebral translation, rib vertebral angle difference, and trunkshift.
RESULTS: The triradiate cartilage was open in 24 patients at the time of operation. Of those 24, only nine (37.5%) had documented proof of crankshaft. Patients with closed triradiate cartilage had no significant postoperative increase in radiographic parameters (0 of 9). The subgroup of patients with idiopathic scoliosis had an average age of 11 years 3 months (range, 9 years 2 months-11 years 11 months). Five of 14 patients had an open triradiate cartilage. All were followed up to skeletal maturity. None had significant progression in postoperative radiographic parameters.
CONCLUSION: This study did not find an open triradiate cartilage to be an absolute prognostic indicator for the occurrence of crankshaft. Additional refinement of markers of maturity are needed to determine who requires anterior arthrodesis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app