Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A prospective study of the usefulness of clinical and laboratory parameters for predicting percentage of dehydration in children.

To evaluate the relative utility of clinical and laboratory parameters of dehydration in children for predicting the magnitude of percent less of body weight (PLBW), we studied 97 children who required intravenous fluids for acute dehydration. After a complete history and physical examination, the managing physician made a clinical estimation of dehydration for each child, based on a standard clinical scale. Serum electrolytes were obtained in all children prior to intravenous hydration therapy. PLBW was calculated after recovery from acute dehydration by comparing the weight on presentation to the emergency department with the weight measured at a follow-up visit when the child was judged well. Children were classified according to PLBW into three groups which reflect the categories in a standard clinical scale: mild = PLBW < or = 5 (n = 50), moderate = PLBW 6-10 (n = 30), and severe = PLBW > 10 (n = 17). The physician's clinical estimate of dehydration compared to PLBW had a sensitivity of 74% (95% confidence interval (CI): 60-85) for mild dehydration, 33% (95% CI: 17-53) for moderate dehydration, and 70% (95% CI: 44-89) for severe dehydration. There was a significant difference in the mean serum bicarbonate concentrations (HCO3) between the PLBW groups (P < 0.01). The sensitivity of the HCO3 < 17 mEq/L in predicting PLBW was 77% (95% CI: 58-90) for PLBW 6-10, and 94% (95% CI: 71-100) for PLBW > 10. The combination of the clinical scale and the serum bicarbonate identified all 17 children with PLBW > 10 and 90% (27 of 30) children with PLBW 6-10. Our data suggest that physicians should not rely solely on clinical assessment to rule out severe dehydration in children, and that obtaining a serum bicarbonate may improve the accuracy of predicting serious dehydration.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app