We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
The intrastromal corneal ring segments. Phase II results for the correction of myopia.
Ophthalmology 1997 July
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) for the correction of myopia.
DESIGN: A 2-year phase II clinical trial of ICRS was initiated in May 1995. The investigational plan specifies that 150 patients with sighted eyes, requiring myopic corrections from -1.00 to -6.00 diopters (D), will each receive ICRS in 1 eye. The patient population will be divided into approximately five patients per ICRS thickness (0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, and 0.45 mm) per site. Six investigational sites are participating in the trial.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine men and 43 women requiring myopic corrections were enrolled at four U.S. investigational sites. These 102 patients each received the ICRS product in 1 eye.
INTERVENTION: Correction of myopia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy of ICRS was assessed with respect to the trial endpoints of predictability of refractive effect, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), stability of UCVA, maintenance of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and stability of refractive effect.
RESULTS: As shown by the available month-3 data (99 patients; all device thicknesses), 95 (96%) of 99 patients had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ninety-eight (99%) of 99 patients were within 2 lines of their preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. The average change (with standard error) in cycloplegic refraction (spherical equivalent) achieved by ICRS thickness was -1.27 +/- 0.09 D (0.25 mm), -2.13 +/- 0.16 D (0.30 mm), -2.56 +/- 0.15 D (0.35 mm), -3.77 +/- 0.37 D (0.40 mm) and -4.16 +/- 0.24 D (0.45 mm). Seventy-seven percent (76/99) of the patients were within +/-1.00 D of their intended correction. When the ICRS was removed in two cases, both patients returned to within 0.75 D of their preoperative manifest refraction.
CONCLUSIONS: The ICRS appears to be a viable and effective alternative for the treatment of myopia. Additionally, as indicated by the explant data, the ICRS's refractive effect may be reversible upon removal of the device.
DESIGN: A 2-year phase II clinical trial of ICRS was initiated in May 1995. The investigational plan specifies that 150 patients with sighted eyes, requiring myopic corrections from -1.00 to -6.00 diopters (D), will each receive ICRS in 1 eye. The patient population will be divided into approximately five patients per ICRS thickness (0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, and 0.45 mm) per site. Six investigational sites are participating in the trial.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine men and 43 women requiring myopic corrections were enrolled at four U.S. investigational sites. These 102 patients each received the ICRS product in 1 eye.
INTERVENTION: Correction of myopia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy of ICRS was assessed with respect to the trial endpoints of predictability of refractive effect, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), stability of UCVA, maintenance of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and stability of refractive effect.
RESULTS: As shown by the available month-3 data (99 patients; all device thicknesses), 95 (96%) of 99 patients had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ninety-eight (99%) of 99 patients were within 2 lines of their preoperative best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. The average change (with standard error) in cycloplegic refraction (spherical equivalent) achieved by ICRS thickness was -1.27 +/- 0.09 D (0.25 mm), -2.13 +/- 0.16 D (0.30 mm), -2.56 +/- 0.15 D (0.35 mm), -3.77 +/- 0.37 D (0.40 mm) and -4.16 +/- 0.24 D (0.45 mm). Seventy-seven percent (76/99) of the patients were within +/-1.00 D of their intended correction. When the ICRS was removed in two cases, both patients returned to within 0.75 D of their preoperative manifest refraction.
CONCLUSIONS: The ICRS appears to be a viable and effective alternative for the treatment of myopia. Additionally, as indicated by the explant data, the ICRS's refractive effect may be reversible upon removal of the device.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app