We have located links that may give you full text access.
Giant retinal tear as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments during cataract surgery.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 1997 August
PURPOSE: To report giant retinal tear and retinal detachment as a complication of attempted removal of intravitreal lens fragments at the time of cataract surgery and to evaluate the anatomic and visual acuity outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy and retinal reattachment surgery.
METHODS: Retrospectively, 10 patients with giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and intravitreal lens fragments in 10 eyes were reviewed.
RESULTS: In 10 eyes, retrieval of intravitreal lens fragments using the limbal approach by deep vitrectomy, copious vitreous cavity irrigation, or deep vitreous cavity phacoemulsification had been attempted by the anterior segment surgeon at the time of cataract surgery in each patient. The average interval from cataract surgery to the initial vitreoretinal consultation was 8 days. Each of the 10 eyes had a giant retinal tear involving the inferior retina: in four eyes, of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees; in four, equal to 180 degrees; and in two, of greater than 180 degrees. After pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair, nine (90%) of 10 eyes had retinal reattachment, but seven patients required more than one operation. One eye had persistent retinal detachment, and one eye had corneal graft failure. Seven (70%) of the 10 eyes had best-corrected final visual acuity of 20/200 or better; three eyes had light-perception, hand-motion, and counting-fingers vision.
CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive attempts at intravitreal lens fragment retrieval from a limbal-based approach should be avoided because these procedures may result in serious retinal complications, such as formation of a giant retinal tear.
METHODS: Retrospectively, 10 patients with giant retinal tear, retinal detachment, and intravitreal lens fragments in 10 eyes were reviewed.
RESULTS: In 10 eyes, retrieval of intravitreal lens fragments using the limbal approach by deep vitrectomy, copious vitreous cavity irrigation, or deep vitreous cavity phacoemulsification had been attempted by the anterior segment surgeon at the time of cataract surgery in each patient. The average interval from cataract surgery to the initial vitreoretinal consultation was 8 days. Each of the 10 eyes had a giant retinal tear involving the inferior retina: in four eyes, of between 90 degrees and 180 degrees; in four, equal to 180 degrees; and in two, of greater than 180 degrees. After pars plana vitrectomy and retinal detachment repair, nine (90%) of 10 eyes had retinal reattachment, but seven patients required more than one operation. One eye had persistent retinal detachment, and one eye had corneal graft failure. Seven (70%) of the 10 eyes had best-corrected final visual acuity of 20/200 or better; three eyes had light-perception, hand-motion, and counting-fingers vision.
CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive attempts at intravitreal lens fragment retrieval from a limbal-based approach should be avoided because these procedures may result in serious retinal complications, such as formation of a giant retinal tear.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app