We have located links that may give you full text access.
Serum erythropoietin in the diagnosis of polycythemia vera. A follow-up study.
Haematologica 1997 July
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that the determination of serum erythropoietin (sEpo) may be useful in distinguishing between polycythemia vera (PV), relative polycythemia and secondary polycythemia (SP), but no conclusive evidence has yet been provided for this. In the present work, we evaluated the role of sEpo in the differential diagnosis of polycythemia vera and its usefulness in the follow-up of PV patients.
METHODS: sEpo was assessed in 190 patients with polycythemia of different etiologies. A follow-up study was carried out in some of these patients (27 with secondary polycythemia and 17 with polycythemia vera).
RESULTS: sEpo levels were higher in SP than in PV and relative polycythemia. There were, however, differences with regard to the various etiologies of SP. Polycythemia related to congenital heart disorders showed the highest levels of sEpo of the SP. When a study was conducted, sEpo alone as a diagnostic parameter displayed an efficiency of more than 90% and the most discriminating value was 5 U/L. Using lower levels (below 2 U/L) and higher levels (above 12 U/L), it was possible to distinguish between SP and PV, although an important overlap was detected between these limits (approximately 50% of cases). The follow-up study showed that in half the patients with SP the levels of sEpo were at times < 12 U/L and at other times greater than this value. At least three determinations were necessary to detect an elevated reading. In PV after venesection there was an increase in sEpo in some cases, although most of the time there was no change.
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Using sEpo, it was possible to differentiate between PV and SP, despite an important overlap. A follow-up study demonstrated that the increase in sEpo was intermittent in SP and that in many of these cases more than one determination could be helpful.
METHODS: sEpo was assessed in 190 patients with polycythemia of different etiologies. A follow-up study was carried out in some of these patients (27 with secondary polycythemia and 17 with polycythemia vera).
RESULTS: sEpo levels were higher in SP than in PV and relative polycythemia. There were, however, differences with regard to the various etiologies of SP. Polycythemia related to congenital heart disorders showed the highest levels of sEpo of the SP. When a study was conducted, sEpo alone as a diagnostic parameter displayed an efficiency of more than 90% and the most discriminating value was 5 U/L. Using lower levels (below 2 U/L) and higher levels (above 12 U/L), it was possible to distinguish between SP and PV, although an important overlap was detected between these limits (approximately 50% of cases). The follow-up study showed that in half the patients with SP the levels of sEpo were at times < 12 U/L and at other times greater than this value. At least three determinations were necessary to detect an elevated reading. In PV after venesection there was an increase in sEpo in some cases, although most of the time there was no change.
INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Using sEpo, it was possible to differentiate between PV and SP, despite an important overlap. A follow-up study demonstrated that the increase in sEpo was intermittent in SP and that in many of these cases more than one determination could be helpful.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app