We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Intra-operative facial nerve monitoring. Its predictive value after skull base surgery.
Journal of Laryngology and Otology 1997 August
PURPOSE: Facial nerve monitoring can be used to predict post-operative facial function after skull base surgery. In this study three methods of prediction of facial function were compared. These methods utilize various parameters of the evoked electromyographic monitoring.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent surgery for skull base diseases were retrospectively reviewed. Amplitude of ongoing electromyographic activity, stimulation current thresholds and amplitude of evoked response were analysed. The predictive value of the three methods was correlated with post-operative facial nerve function.
RESULTS: The method that used only the stimulation thresholds predicted the final post-operative facial function in 86.9 per cent of the patients. The second employed a mathematical ratio which combined the amplitude of evoked response and the stimulation current thresholds and confirmed the prediction of the facial function in 91.3 per cent of the patients. The last method does not consider the stimulation thresholds greater than 0.05 mA and failed to predict the final VIIth nerve function in patients in whom the stimulation was greater than 0.05 mA.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of prognostic value demonstrates that the first two methods had the smaller degree of variation showing the better sensitivity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent surgery for skull base diseases were retrospectively reviewed. Amplitude of ongoing electromyographic activity, stimulation current thresholds and amplitude of evoked response were analysed. The predictive value of the three methods was correlated with post-operative facial nerve function.
RESULTS: The method that used only the stimulation thresholds predicted the final post-operative facial function in 86.9 per cent of the patients. The second employed a mathematical ratio which combined the amplitude of evoked response and the stimulation current thresholds and confirmed the prediction of the facial function in 91.3 per cent of the patients. The last method does not consider the stimulation thresholds greater than 0.05 mA and failed to predict the final VIIth nerve function in patients in whom the stimulation was greater than 0.05 mA.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of prognostic value demonstrates that the first two methods had the smaller degree of variation showing the better sensitivity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app