We have located links that may give you full text access.
CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparative study of cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia assay, polymerase chain reaction, serology, and shell vial assay in the early diagnosis and monitoring of CMV infection after renal transplantation.
Transplantation 1997 December 28
BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, which is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients, remains of great importance. This prospective study was performed in kidney transplant recipients to determine the diagnostic value of the CMV antigenemia assay in comparison with polymerase chain reaction (PCR), serology, and shell vial assay.
METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this study and monitored by both antigenemia assay and serology. The initial 34 of the 75 patients were subjected to PCR and shell vial assay.
RESULTS: Antigenemia, PCR, and shell vial assay became positive before the onset of CMV-related symptoms in 31/34 (89%), 13/16 (81%), and 2/16 (13%), respectively. None of the 34 patients who had symptomatic CMV disease showed a significant increase in IgG or IgM before the onset of symptoms. Antigenemia and PCR assays turned positive, 7 and 11 days (median), respectively, before the onset of clinical symptoms. Serology and shell vial assay became positive 21 and 25 days (median), respectively, after the onset of CMV-related clinical symptoms. To examine the clinical value of these assays, "good correlation" was defined based on the correlation between the clinical course and the results of the assays. Good correlation with the antigenemia assay was observed in 33 (96%) out of 34 renal transplant recipients who recovered from their CMV disease after ganciclovir therapy. Only one of 16 (7%) patients showed good correlation by shell vial assay, whereas PCR and serology did not show a good correlation. Consequently, antigenemia was considered the best way to monitor CMV infections after kidney transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Only the CMV antigenemia assay can be successfully employed after renal transplantation for the early diagnosis and extensive monitoring of active CMV infection.
METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this study and monitored by both antigenemia assay and serology. The initial 34 of the 75 patients were subjected to PCR and shell vial assay.
RESULTS: Antigenemia, PCR, and shell vial assay became positive before the onset of CMV-related symptoms in 31/34 (89%), 13/16 (81%), and 2/16 (13%), respectively. None of the 34 patients who had symptomatic CMV disease showed a significant increase in IgG or IgM before the onset of symptoms. Antigenemia and PCR assays turned positive, 7 and 11 days (median), respectively, before the onset of clinical symptoms. Serology and shell vial assay became positive 21 and 25 days (median), respectively, after the onset of CMV-related clinical symptoms. To examine the clinical value of these assays, "good correlation" was defined based on the correlation between the clinical course and the results of the assays. Good correlation with the antigenemia assay was observed in 33 (96%) out of 34 renal transplant recipients who recovered from their CMV disease after ganciclovir therapy. Only one of 16 (7%) patients showed good correlation by shell vial assay, whereas PCR and serology did not show a good correlation. Consequently, antigenemia was considered the best way to monitor CMV infections after kidney transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Only the CMV antigenemia assay can be successfully employed after renal transplantation for the early diagnosis and extensive monitoring of active CMV infection.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app