We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Haemodynamic and electroencephalograph responses to intubation during induction with propofol or propofol/fentanyl.
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 1998 January
PURPOSE: To observe the changes in EEG bispectral index (BIS), 95% spectral edge frequency (95% SEF) and median frequency (MF) with haemodynamic changes to intubation during induction with propofol or propofol and 2 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl i.v.
METHODS: Twenty four ASA I-II patients were randomized to receive either propofol infusion preceded by normal saline (group P, n = 12) or propofol preceded by 2 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl (group PF, n = 12). Intubation was performed five minutes after maintenance of BIS within 45 +/- 5. EEG and haemodynamic variables were recorded at before induction, and before and after intubation.
RESULTS: Haemodynamic responses to intubation were greater in group P than in group PF (P < 0.05). Postintubation SBP, DBP and HR increased, compared with preinduction values, more in group P than in group PF. Postintubation BIS values increased from 45.5 +/- 3.5 and 44.2 +/- 4.1 to 51.1 +/- 4.1 and 50.9 +/- 5.3 in groups P and PF, respectively, compared with preintubation values. The BIS values were not different between treatment groups before and after intubation, and 95% SEF and MF values did not increase after intubation.
CONCLUSION: Fentanyl, 2 micrograms.kg-1 i.v., blunted the haemodynamic responses to intubation, but failed to attenuate the arousal of cerebral cortical activity. The different haemodynamic responses postintubation but similar BIS and 95% SEF changes in the two groups suggest that BIS or 95% SEF cannot predict the haemodynamic responses to intubation during anaesthesia induction with propofol and fentanyl.
METHODS: Twenty four ASA I-II patients were randomized to receive either propofol infusion preceded by normal saline (group P, n = 12) or propofol preceded by 2 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl (group PF, n = 12). Intubation was performed five minutes after maintenance of BIS within 45 +/- 5. EEG and haemodynamic variables were recorded at before induction, and before and after intubation.
RESULTS: Haemodynamic responses to intubation were greater in group P than in group PF (P < 0.05). Postintubation SBP, DBP and HR increased, compared with preinduction values, more in group P than in group PF. Postintubation BIS values increased from 45.5 +/- 3.5 and 44.2 +/- 4.1 to 51.1 +/- 4.1 and 50.9 +/- 5.3 in groups P and PF, respectively, compared with preintubation values. The BIS values were not different between treatment groups before and after intubation, and 95% SEF and MF values did not increase after intubation.
CONCLUSION: Fentanyl, 2 micrograms.kg-1 i.v., blunted the haemodynamic responses to intubation, but failed to attenuate the arousal of cerebral cortical activity. The different haemodynamic responses postintubation but similar BIS and 95% SEF changes in the two groups suggest that BIS or 95% SEF cannot predict the haemodynamic responses to intubation during anaesthesia induction with propofol and fentanyl.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app