We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Conventional plain-film radiology, ultrasonography and CT in jejuno-ileal perforation.
Acta Radiologica 1998 January
PURPOSE: To evaluate conventional radiography, US and CT in identifying jejuno-ileal perforation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the findings of conventional radiography, US and CT in 13 consecutive patients with surgically proven jejuno-ileal perforation.
RESULTS: The site of perforation was the ileum in 10 cases and the jejunum in 3 cases. Free gas was identified in 6 cases (46%) while indirect findings of perforation were found in 7 (54%). The jejunal perforations were diagnosed by indirect findings in all 3 cases. The ileal perforations were diagnosed by direct findings in 6 cases and indirect findings in 4 cases.
CONCLUSION: Conventional radiology did not detect free gas in 7 (54%) of the 13 patients examined. In the absence of free gas, radiology showed indirect signs in all 7 patients, the most common being intraperitoneal free fluid in 5 (71%) of them. Jejunal perforations were more rare than ileal perforations and more difficult to identify by radiology. US was not useful for detecting free gas but it was useful for identifying intraperitoneal free fluid and intestinal paresis. Abdominal CT was useful when performed 6 h after the symptoms began.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the findings of conventional radiography, US and CT in 13 consecutive patients with surgically proven jejuno-ileal perforation.
RESULTS: The site of perforation was the ileum in 10 cases and the jejunum in 3 cases. Free gas was identified in 6 cases (46%) while indirect findings of perforation were found in 7 (54%). The jejunal perforations were diagnosed by indirect findings in all 3 cases. The ileal perforations were diagnosed by direct findings in 6 cases and indirect findings in 4 cases.
CONCLUSION: Conventional radiology did not detect free gas in 7 (54%) of the 13 patients examined. In the absence of free gas, radiology showed indirect signs in all 7 patients, the most common being intraperitoneal free fluid in 5 (71%) of them. Jejunal perforations were more rare than ileal perforations and more difficult to identify by radiology. US was not useful for detecting free gas but it was useful for identifying intraperitoneal free fluid and intestinal paresis. Abdominal CT was useful when performed 6 h after the symptoms began.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app