We have located links that may give you full text access.
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: initial misdiagnosis and the effect on treatment.
European Journal of Surgery = Acta Chirurgica 1998 January
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of misdiagnosis in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and its effect on treatment and outcome.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital, The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: 97 consecutive patients admitted with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm during the 5-year period, 1 January 1989--31 December 1993.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial diagnosis, interval between onset of symptoms and admission, and mortality.
RESULTS: 38 Patients (43%) presented with symptoms of their aneurysm exceeding nine hours prior to admission (range 10 hours to 14 days, median 2 days). Fifty patients (60%) were initially misdiagnosed by the referring practitioner. Ultrasonography was consistent with rupture in only 36/70 (51%). 52 Patients died (54%), (operative mortality 45 (46%)), and was not affected by delay in diagnosis or treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Although delay in diagnosis or treatment did not seem to affect mortality, improved awareness of non-specific presentations of (imminent) rupture will result in fewer misdiagnoses and earlier treatment. A group of patients will undoubtedly benefit from this as they can be operated on at a stage when expected mortality is lower.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Teaching hospital, The Netherlands.
SUBJECTS: 97 consecutive patients admitted with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm during the 5-year period, 1 January 1989--31 December 1993.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial diagnosis, interval between onset of symptoms and admission, and mortality.
RESULTS: 38 Patients (43%) presented with symptoms of their aneurysm exceeding nine hours prior to admission (range 10 hours to 14 days, median 2 days). Fifty patients (60%) were initially misdiagnosed by the referring practitioner. Ultrasonography was consistent with rupture in only 36/70 (51%). 52 Patients died (54%), (operative mortality 45 (46%)), and was not affected by delay in diagnosis or treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Although delay in diagnosis or treatment did not seem to affect mortality, improved awareness of non-specific presentations of (imminent) rupture will result in fewer misdiagnoses and earlier treatment. A group of patients will undoubtedly benefit from this as they can be operated on at a stage when expected mortality is lower.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app