Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Open versus laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy for palliation in advanced pancreatic cancer.

To assess short-term outcome of open (OGJ) versus laparoscopic (LGJ) gastrojejunostomy in palliation of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) caused by advanced pancreatic cancer, 22 OGJ patients were compared with 9 diagnosis-matched LGJ controls operated on at the same hospital between 1991 and 1996. Patients undergoing OGJ and LGJ were comparable for age, gender, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists grading, and previous extensive abdominal surgery, but not for gastroenterostomy performed as a prophylactic procedure (9 vs. 0, respectively). Mortality (5 vs. 1, p = 1.5), overall morbidity (9 vs. 3, p = 0.42), operating time (113.6 +/- 24.5 minutes vs. 125 +/- 15.2 minutes, p < 0.5), time to oral solid food intake (7.2 +/- 0.9 days vs. 5.3 +/- 1.3 days, p < 0.5), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption (7,563.6 +/- 3,381.3 mg vs. 2,044 +/- 673 mg, p < 0.5), opioid consumption (688.5 +/- 258.6 mg vs. 2,910.5 +/- 2,659.9 mg, p < 0.5), delayed-return gastric emptying (5 vs. 1, p = 0.12), postoperative hospital stay (14.6 +/- 1.9 days vs. 10.1 +/- 1.8 days, p < 0.5), survival (5.7 +/- 0.8 months vs. 4.6 +/- 0.6 months, p < 0.5), and further hospital stay before death (9.8 +/- 3.3 days vs. 11.6 +/- 3.4 days, p > 0.5) were not significantly different in 22 OGJ and 9 LGJ patients, respectively. Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in LGJ patients (270.2 +/- 45.8 ml vs. 66 +/- 15.7 ml, p < 0.01). When 13 of 22 patients undergoing OGJ for treatment were compared with 9 LGJ patients, only estimated blood loss (p < 0.01) and hospital stay (p < 0.05) were significantly reduced in LGJ patients. Recurrent GOO before death occurred in one patient (1 of 22, 4.5%) 9 months after OGJ. LGJ for palliative treatment of GOO in advanced pancreatic cancer offered (in spite of the learning curve) reduced estimated blood loss and hospital stay when compared with OGJ.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app