We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical features of 201 cases with Duane's retraction syndrome.
Chinese Medical Journal 1997 October
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical features of 201 cases with Duane's retraction syndrome (DRS) and discuss its differential diagnosis.
METHODS: We retrospectively summarized the 201 cases from 1979 to 1996. The clinical features including chief complaints, sexual distribution, age at first visit, laterality, type of presentation, ocular deviation in the primary position, refractive errors, amblyopia, globe retraction, change of the palpebral fissure, upshoot and downshoot in adduction, binocular single vision, and its associated ocular and non-ocular anomalies were analysed.
RESULTS: There were 99 males and 102 females with a female-to-male ratio 1:1. The 65.88% of DRS cases had left eye involvement with two-to-one predilection for the left eye. The most common form of the syndrome was type I (184 patients, 91.54%). Exotropia was the most common deviation in the primary gaze (72 patients, 35.8%). Among 118 patients, most had abduction deficits, globe retraction in adduction, and faceturn as to maintaining single binocular vision. Crocodial tears (26 patients, 11.93%) was the most frequently encounted ocular abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of DRS in a typical case is not difficult, however, children with bilateral abduction deficits which may mimic DRS must be differentiated from the following four motility disorders, namely, abducens nerve palsy, Moebius syndrome, congenital oculomotor apraxia, and congenital or infantile esotropia.
METHODS: We retrospectively summarized the 201 cases from 1979 to 1996. The clinical features including chief complaints, sexual distribution, age at first visit, laterality, type of presentation, ocular deviation in the primary position, refractive errors, amblyopia, globe retraction, change of the palpebral fissure, upshoot and downshoot in adduction, binocular single vision, and its associated ocular and non-ocular anomalies were analysed.
RESULTS: There were 99 males and 102 females with a female-to-male ratio 1:1. The 65.88% of DRS cases had left eye involvement with two-to-one predilection for the left eye. The most common form of the syndrome was type I (184 patients, 91.54%). Exotropia was the most common deviation in the primary gaze (72 patients, 35.8%). Among 118 patients, most had abduction deficits, globe retraction in adduction, and faceturn as to maintaining single binocular vision. Crocodial tears (26 patients, 11.93%) was the most frequently encounted ocular abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of DRS in a typical case is not difficult, however, children with bilateral abduction deficits which may mimic DRS must be differentiated from the following four motility disorders, namely, abducens nerve palsy, Moebius syndrome, congenital oculomotor apraxia, and congenital or infantile esotropia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app