We have located links that may give you full text access.
Experimental study of the histocompatibility of covered expandable metallic stents in the trachea.
Chest 1998 July
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the histocompatibility of four different materials used to cover expandable metallic stents.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, unblinded study.
SETTING: Animal research laboratory of Kurume University.
PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Twenty 12- to 18-kg mongrel dogs.
INTERVENTIONS: Handmade Gianturco-type stents with six bends, 20 mm in length, and 15 to 20 mm in diameter were covered using four different materials: polypropylene mesh, silicone-coated mesh, polyester mesh, and ePTFE. Covered stents were inserted into the trachea after i.v. anesthesia. Five animals were used in each group.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Postinsertion status was observed using clinical and bronchoscopy measures 7, 14, 28, and 56 days after intervention. Eight weeks after stent insertion, the tracheal specimens were studied pathologically. A scoring system was used to evaluate the histocompatibility of covered stents in each study group. The mean of clinical scores in the polypropylene group was 1.84+/-0.36, which was significantly higher than those in the groups of silicone, polyester, and ePTFE. The means of histopathologic scores in the polypropylene group and the silicone group were 1.60+/-0.55, which were significantly higher than those in groups of polyester and ePTFE.
CONCLUSIONS: Polypropylene mesh cover was more suitable than silicone-coated mesh, polyester mesh, and ePTFE because of its excellent histocompatibility.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, unblinded study.
SETTING: Animal research laboratory of Kurume University.
PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Twenty 12- to 18-kg mongrel dogs.
INTERVENTIONS: Handmade Gianturco-type stents with six bends, 20 mm in length, and 15 to 20 mm in diameter were covered using four different materials: polypropylene mesh, silicone-coated mesh, polyester mesh, and ePTFE. Covered stents were inserted into the trachea after i.v. anesthesia. Five animals were used in each group.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Postinsertion status was observed using clinical and bronchoscopy measures 7, 14, 28, and 56 days after intervention. Eight weeks after stent insertion, the tracheal specimens were studied pathologically. A scoring system was used to evaluate the histocompatibility of covered stents in each study group. The mean of clinical scores in the polypropylene group was 1.84+/-0.36, which was significantly higher than those in the groups of silicone, polyester, and ePTFE. The means of histopathologic scores in the polypropylene group and the silicone group were 1.60+/-0.55, which were significantly higher than those in groups of polyester and ePTFE.
CONCLUSIONS: Polypropylene mesh cover was more suitable than silicone-coated mesh, polyester mesh, and ePTFE because of its excellent histocompatibility.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app