Comparative Study
Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Recurrent aortic coarctation: is surgical repair still the gold standard?

OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience with surgical repair compared with balloon aortoplasty of recurrent coarctations of the aorta.

METHODS: This is a retrospective review of 1 institution's 27-year experience with surgical repair of recurrent aortic coarctation. A thorough chart review was performed of all pediatric patients undergoing surgical repair for recurrent aortic coarctation (n = 56) from January 1970 through July 1996.

RESULTS: The vast majority of recoarctations were repaired with a prosthetic patch technique, with a greater than 96% success rate. No deaths or major complications occurred in the 56 patients. Although a direct comparison with balloon aortoplasty cannot be done, we have reviewed the data available in the literature and found higher complication rates and lower success rates than we obtained in our series.

CONCLUSIONS: Although the treatment of aortic coarctation has improved significantly during the past decades, persistent hypertension after repairs at an older age and recurrent coarctation after repairs in neonates occur in all institutions. Surgeons have not agreed on the optimal approach to primary coarctation repair, and invasive cardiologists have challenged operative intervention for both recurrent and primary coarctation. This study demonstrates that surgical repair of recurrent coarctation of the aorta can be performed safely and with excellent results. We believe it is still the gold standard in the management of recurrent coarctation of the aorta.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app