COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Percutaneous removal of benign mammographic lesions: comparison of automated large-core and directional vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy techniques.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate how often histologically benign lesions were completely removed as shown by the initial mammogram after biopsy. We compared three percutaneous biopsy techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on 1206 consecutive impalpable breast lesions having percutaneous stereotactic biopsies done on a prone biopsy table using 14-gauge automated large-core needles (n = 721); 14-gauge directional vacuum-assisted probes (n = 192); and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted probes (n = 293). Lesions that were histologically benign and that did not have subsequent surgical excision had mammographic follow-up. The 667 initial mammograms after biopsy (advised to be done at 6 or 12 months and accomplished at 1-53 months [median, 7 months] after biopsy) were reviewed to see if the lesions were no longer apparent.

RESULTS: The lesion was absent in 9% (40/422) of lesions for which 14-gauge large-core biopsy was used, 22% (21/95) of lesions for which 14-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy was used, and 64% (96/150) of lesions for which 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy was used (p < .0001). No mammographic pseudolesions were created by the biopsy. No clinically significant complications occurred.

CONCLUSION: The lesion was more often completely removed with directional vacuum-assisted biopsy than with automated large-core biopsy and more often completely removed with 11-gauge probes than with 14-gauge probes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

Managing Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.Annals of Emergency Medicine 2024 March 26

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app