We have located links that may give you full text access.
Photorefractive keratectomy for astigmatism greater than -2.00 diopters in eyes with low, high, or extreme myopia.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 1998 November
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of excimer laser photorefractive astigmatic keratectomy (PARK) in correcting astigmatism of more than -2.00 diopters (D) in eyes with low, high, and extreme myopia.
SETTING: Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients (110 eyes) whose spherical error ranged from -3.00 to -13.00 D and cylinder ranged from -2.00 to -5.50 D had PARK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser; follow-up was 6 months. All cases of myopic astigmatism were treated using the elliptical method and multizone ablation technique. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: low myopia, less than 6.00 D (n = 47); high myopia, from 6.25 to 10.00 D (n = 43); extreme myopia, over 10.25 D (n = 20). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate the astigmatic change.
RESULTS: By vector analysis, the success rate of astigmatic correction was more predictable in the low and high myopia groups than in the extreme myopia group (P < .05). There was little improvement in astigmatism in the extreme myopia group.
CONCLUSION: Using PARK to correct astigmatism greater than -2.00 D in eyes with myopia less than -10.00 D tended to result in undercorrection; astigmatic correction in eyes with myopia over 10.25 D was minimal.
SETTING: Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients (110 eyes) whose spherical error ranged from -3.00 to -13.00 D and cylinder ranged from -2.00 to -5.50 D had PARK with a VISX Twenty-Twenty excimer laser; follow-up was 6 months. All cases of myopic astigmatism were treated using the elliptical method and multizone ablation technique. Eyes were divided into 3 groups: low myopia, less than 6.00 D (n = 47); high myopia, from 6.25 to 10.00 D (n = 43); extreme myopia, over 10.25 D (n = 20). Alpins vector analysis was used to calculate the astigmatic change.
RESULTS: By vector analysis, the success rate of astigmatic correction was more predictable in the low and high myopia groups than in the extreme myopia group (P < .05). There was little improvement in astigmatism in the extreme myopia group.
CONCLUSION: Using PARK to correct astigmatism greater than -2.00 D in eyes with myopia less than -10.00 D tended to result in undercorrection; astigmatic correction in eyes with myopia over 10.25 D was minimal.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app