COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Diagnosis of "non-organic" limb paresis by a novel objective motor assessment: the quantitative Hoover's test.

Journal of Neurology 1998 December
The differentiation of "non-organic" limb weakness from genuine paralysis is sometimes difficult in neurological practice. To address this problem, we developed a computerized quantitative method, based on the Hoover's test principle, that determines the extent of involuntary limb activation when contralateral movement is performed. Measurements of hip or arm extension isometric force are performed during direct maximal voluntary effort and during contralateral hip flexion. Maximal involuntary/voluntary force ratio (IVVR) is calculated. IVVR of the lower limbs in ten healthy subjects was 0.614, 0.044 (mean, SEM). Similar results were obtained from seven patients with genuine weakness and in the non-affected limbs of nine patients with "non-organic" mono- or hemiparesis. In contrast, IVVR in the affected limbs in the "non-organic" group was markedly increased (2.48, 0.61; P < 0.001). The same pattern was elicited in the upper limbs (2.27, 0.46 vs 0.406, 0.06; P < 0,001). We conclude that Hoover's sign in "nonorganic" paralysis is a preservation or increase of a normal synkinetic phenomenon. Quantitative measurement of the IVVR can serve as a useful ancillary test in diagnosing non-organic weakness in either lower or upper limbs.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app