We have located links that may give you full text access.
Repeat tear of postoperative meniscus: potential MR imaging signs.
Radiology 1999 January
PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of five magnetic resonance (MR) signs of repeat tears of the postoperative meniscus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fat-saturated proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted MR images in 20 patients who had undergone at least two knee surgeries were reviewed. Second-look arthroscopic confirmation of meniscal status was available in all patients. MR images of 39 menisci (10 repeat tears, 11 postoperative menisci without repeat tears, three tears in previously normal menisci, and 15 normal menisci) were evaluated for (a) a linear area of abnormal signal intensity extending to an articular surface on intermediate-weighted images, (b) abnormal meniscal morphology, (c) likelihood of a typical postoperative appearance, (d) fluid extending into the linear area on T2-weighted images, and (e) cartilage defects. Two radiologists rated their confidence on a five-point scale for the presence of these signs and were compared for level of agreement.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (range, 0.75-0.91) indicated a high level of agreement. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were large (range, 0.70-0.87) for all five signs, with a line (grade 3 signal intensity) and fluid within a line having the highest areas. These two signs also had the highest statistical scores (chi 2 = 14.12 and 13.30; P < .002; odds ratio, 1.588 and 1.599 for the line and the fluid within the line, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The two best MR signs of repeat tear of the postoperative meniscus were the presence of a line and fluid within the line extending to an articular surface.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fat-saturated proton-density-weighted and T2-weighted MR images in 20 patients who had undergone at least two knee surgeries were reviewed. Second-look arthroscopic confirmation of meniscal status was available in all patients. MR images of 39 menisci (10 repeat tears, 11 postoperative menisci without repeat tears, three tears in previously normal menisci, and 15 normal menisci) were evaluated for (a) a linear area of abnormal signal intensity extending to an articular surface on intermediate-weighted images, (b) abnormal meniscal morphology, (c) likelihood of a typical postoperative appearance, (d) fluid extending into the linear area on T2-weighted images, and (e) cartilage defects. Two radiologists rated their confidence on a five-point scale for the presence of these signs and were compared for level of agreement.
RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficient (range, 0.75-0.91) indicated a high level of agreement. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were large (range, 0.70-0.87) for all five signs, with a line (grade 3 signal intensity) and fluid within a line having the highest areas. These two signs also had the highest statistical scores (chi 2 = 14.12 and 13.30; P < .002; odds ratio, 1.588 and 1.599 for the line and the fluid within the line, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The two best MR signs of repeat tear of the postoperative meniscus were the presence of a line and fluid within the line extending to an articular surface.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app