We have located links that may give you full text access.
Cervical carcinoma: can dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging help predict tumor aggressiveness?
Radiology 1999 January
PURPOSE: To determine whether fast dynamic contrast agent-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can demonstrate tumor aggressiveness of cervical carcinoma in patients who are eligible for surgical treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma was performed in 82 consecutive patients with stage I or IIA disease who were referred for radical hysterectomy. The maximum slope and amplitude of dynamic first-pass contrast enhancement were quantified. These parameters were correlated with histologic measures of tumor aggressiveness (tumor invasion depth, pelvic lymph node status).
RESULTS: The analysis was based on tumors in 62 patients: 30 aggressive and 32 relatively nonaggressive tumors. Twenty patients were excluded from analysis owing to insufficient surgical data, tumor too small for accurate assessment, or technical problems. There were no significant differences between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors in terms of the first-pass contrast-enhancement parameters of slope (2.0 vs 2.1 arbitrary signal intensity units per second, P > .5) or amplitude (24.8 vs 27.8 arbitrary units, P > .2).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging does not facilitate differentiation between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors and therefore has no clinical role in assisting in treatment decisions in patients who are candidates for radical hysterectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of cervical carcinoma was performed in 82 consecutive patients with stage I or IIA disease who were referred for radical hysterectomy. The maximum slope and amplitude of dynamic first-pass contrast enhancement were quantified. These parameters were correlated with histologic measures of tumor aggressiveness (tumor invasion depth, pelvic lymph node status).
RESULTS: The analysis was based on tumors in 62 patients: 30 aggressive and 32 relatively nonaggressive tumors. Twenty patients were excluded from analysis owing to insufficient surgical data, tumor too small for accurate assessment, or technical problems. There were no significant differences between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors in terms of the first-pass contrast-enhancement parameters of slope (2.0 vs 2.1 arbitrary signal intensity units per second, P > .5) or amplitude (24.8 vs 27.8 arbitrary units, P > .2).
CONCLUSION: Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging does not facilitate differentiation between aggressive and nonaggressive tumors and therefore has no clinical role in assisting in treatment decisions in patients who are candidates for radical hysterectomy.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app